LAPD GENDER BALANCE AND REFORM
PASSED
BY THE LOS ANGELES CITY COUNCIL
The
following recommendations and motions were unanimously approved
by the Los Angeles City Council on September 2, 1992.
Police Commission
That the City Council call upon the Mayor to adhere
strictly to the policy of gender balance in appointments to City
Commissions; further, that the City Council express to the Mayor
the extreme urgency of achieving gender balance on the Board of
Police Commissioners as soon as possible given the critical nature
of gender‑related issues raised in the Christopher Commission
report.
Chief of Police
REQUEST the Civil Service Commission to include
the following in its recruitment and selection process for the next
Chief of Police:
1 . Affirmative recruitment of qualified
women both inside and outside the Police Department. This must include
mailings and outreach to women's peace officer associations and
other methods of identifying potential female candidates.
2. Inclusion of language
in the job announcement relative to the City's expectation that
the new Chief will work to eliminate gender bias, sex discrimination
and sexual harassment in the department; to hire and promote female
officers to an extent that reflects their numbers in the general
work force; to establish a working culture within the LAPD that
is inclusive of women; and to develop and implement policies and
training relative to proper handling of domestic violence and
sexual assault.
3. Interview questions which specifically inquire
into tangible measures each applicant might take as Chief of the
Los Angeles Police Department to meet the expectations listed
above; the commitment of each applicant to these goals, and the
measures each applicant has taken in his or her current or past
position(s) to meet the needs of women in law enforcement.
4. Inclusion of women and men in equal
numbers on each interview panel for the selection of the Chief
of Police.
The following
gender balance motion was adopted by the Los Angeles City Council
in November of 1993, replacing the gender balance provision adopted
in September of 1992.
MOTION
0n September 9, 199 2 the City Council unanimously
adopted a package of motions designed to improve policing in our
city by improving conditions for women police officers and increasing
the percentage of police officers who are women. The keynote motion
quoted the Christopher Commission finding that "female officers
are involved in excessive use of force at rates substantially
below those of male officers," and asserted that increasing
the percentage of women in the force "holds the key"
to substantially reduced police violence.
The Council stated
its intent to recruit and hire significantly greater numbers of
women into the police force such that ultimately the percent of
women in the Department will reflect the percent of women in the
Los Angeles area workforce (currently 43.4%). At the same time
the Council increased the 1992‑1993 hiring goal for women
Police Officers from 25 to 30%. This goal was met and surpassed:
fully 33% of new officers in 1992‑93 are women. We
still have a long way to go, however: as of June, 1993 the percent
of women in the police force overall was only 14.4%.
To achieve gender
balance on the force, two major problems must be overcome. First,
the number of women applicants must be vastly increased. Currently,
only 24% of the applicants for the job of police officer are women.
The job of Police Officer carries a starting salary of $34,000
and excellent benefits and opportunities for career enhancement.
In our recession‑racked economy, these jobs should be as
much sought‑after by women as by men. It strains credulity
to suggest that in the Los Angeles metropolitan area, with thousands
of layoffs and cutbacks in all sectors of the economy, there aren't
several thousand women who would welcome the challenge, the opportunity,
and the financial security of a job at LAPD. These women must
be reached and recruited if we are to achieve our goals.
Second, admissions
tests must be reviewed and updated to ensure the absence of gender
bias, and to ensure that we are testing for officers who will
fit the mold of the "new" LAPD. Applicants for police
officer positions go through a battery of test. These tests have
never been screened for discrimination against female applicants.
Between. 1985 and 199 1, almost all the male applicants, but only
about half the female applicants, passed the Physical Abilities
Test. This test requires that applicants scale a six‑foot
wall and perform other activities that favor upper body strength.
No matter how agile or strong, women are by nature less suited
to these activities. Further, officers are not required to maintain
this ability throughout their careers, suggesting these activities
are not relevant to job performance. Therefore, it appears this
test is used primarily to screen out women candidates. All pats
of the Physical Abilities Test must be examined for job relevance
and eliminated or changed if required.
The rest of the examination
process should be reviewed in the context of gender bias as well.
All police recruiting tests are graded on a pass/fail basis except
for the Interview. Individuals who achieve a "pass"
on every test are admitted to the Academy according to
their interview scores. But the interview may
also be biased toward Caucasian men and against women and minorities.
Between October, 1991 and the present, interview scores of 95
and above were achieved by 10, 11 and 12% of Hispanic, black and
female applicants, respectively; but by fully 18% of the white
males. This means that half again as many white males achieved
the highest scores as did women and minority men. This may be
the result of biased interviewers, questions that favor prior
experience in male‑dominated professions, and/or "grade
inflation benefiting Caucasian males. These issues must be reviewed
and resolved to ensure that women and minorities are not treated
unfairly.
The Women's Advisory
Council to the Police Commission has completed a yearlong study
of issues of gender balance and gender equity in the Police Department.
The WAC has identified specific recruiting and testing policies
and procedures that can an should be changed to increase the numbers
of women officers:
recruitment materials can be changed to emphasize
the financial rewards and job security of a career in the LAPD;
recruiting efforts can be directed towards institutions
frequented by women, instead of the current bias towards military
bases and male‑oriented sporting events; recruiters should
target women now working in female‑dominated occupations;
all testing materials should be reviewed and
evaluated for relevance to the job of policing. Test that are
not indicative of future performance as a police officer, such
as "the wall" on the Physical Abilities Test, should
be eliminated;
interview panels should be gender balanced,
and members of interview panels should be screened for bias against
women officers; and
interview
questions should be standardized; the criteria for evaluating
previous work experience and educational background should be
revised to give appropriate weight to skills relevant to community‑based
policing, such as interpersonal skills, at which many women excel.
Implementation of
these recommendations will enable the city to meet its goal of
achieving police department workforce gender parity.
I THEREFORE MOVE that
the City Council change the annual police hiring goal for women
to workforce parity, or 43.4% of all new hires, as of January
1, 1994; and
I FURTBER MOVE that
the City Council instruct the Police and Personnel Departments
to immediately increase female‑directed police recruiting,
and to immediately validate all aspects of police applicant testing
so as to remove any gender bias and to promote the goals of community‑based
policing; and
I FURTBER MOVE that
the Police and Personnel Departments be instructed to report to
the council, through its Budget & finance Committee, on resources
necessary to achieve these goals, and to work with Chief Legislative
Analyst to identify possible sources of grant funding for this
purpose.
Sexual Discrimination and Harassment
1. REQUEST the Board of PoliceCommissioners to include among
its goals the elimination of gender discrimination, gender bias
and sexual harassment within theLAPD, and the achievement of workforce
parity for men and women among the sworn officers of the LAPD.
2. REQUEST that the Board of Police Commissioners assign responsibility
for achieving these goals to the Chief of Police, with oversight
provided by the Commission through one of its employees who will
be responsible for working with the Chief of Police in this regard.
3. REQUEST the Board of Police Commissioners to work closely
with its employee, with the Chief of Police, and with the entire
Department staff to achieve these goals as soon as possible; to
commit whatever resources are necessary to this project without
delay, and to report back to the City Council quarterly on the
Department's progress in this regard.
Accountability of Officers
1. INSTRUCT the Police Commission, with the assistance of the
Personnel Department and suitable independent experts, to:
a. Include attitudes towards the role of women in policing
and towards female victims of crime as criteria for determining
the suitability of applicants to become Police Officers.
b. Give consideration to a candidate's ability to work with
and to accept female Police Officers, as well as any history of
sexual harassment on the part of an officer, and an officer's
handling of sexual harassment cases involving officers under the
officer's command, when evaluating officers, selecting officers
for promotion and assigning officers to work in Academy and field
training positions.
c. Give consideration to the ability of a Police Officer to
utilize a style of policing which emphasizes problem‑solving
and open communication and is mutually beneficial to the police
and the community while mimrnizing excessive use of force and
inappropriate confrontation in evaluating officers, selecting
officers for promotion, and assigning officers to work in Academy
and field training positions.
d. Develop and provide training and counseling to Police Officers
at all levels on sexual harassment and sexual discrimination and
on the role of women in policing, at regular intervals and, for
individual officers, when appropriate.
2. REQUEST the Police Commission to review its policies and
procedures for handling instances of sexual harassment against
women officers, suspects or callers, to ensure that such instances
are considered official misconduct and are reported (whether by
the victim or by onlookers), investigated and disciplined as such;
and to ensure that women officers feel free to report such instances
without fear of retribution.
3. REQUEST the Police Commission to review its policies and
procedures for handling charges of sexual discrimination against
women officers, in particular its power to review any unresolved
sexual discrimination charge and to forward acts of sexual discrimination
which may constitute misconduct to the Internal Affairs division
for investigation and possible disciplinary action.
4. REQUEST the Police Commission to consider developing policies
relative to acts of gender biased and discriminatory behavior,
and to consider classifying such acts as official misconduct.
Gender Balance
1 . STATE the City Council's intent to recruit and
hire significantly greater numbers of women in to the sworn workforce
of the Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD), such that ultimately
the percent of women in the Department will reflect the percent
of women in the Los Angeles area workforce.
2. INCREASE the 1992‑93 hiring
goal for women Police Officers to 30% of those hired, and utilize
those tools legally available to the city to achieve that goal.
3. INSTRUCT the Personnel Department to report
to the City Council annually on its progress in recruiting,
hiring and retaining women officers and to recommend a recruiting
goal for the following year.
4. INSTRUCT the Personnel Department
to work with women's organizations who have expressed a desire
to assist in the recruitment of qualified women who are interested
in careers in the LAPD in order to increase the pool of applicants.
(7his
gender balance provision
was superseded by the attached City Council motion adopted November
1993)
|