LOS ANGELES TIMES
|
FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 18, 2000
|
PERSPECTIVE ON LAPD SCANDAL
This Is What You Get When Men Rule Roost
By KATHERINE SPILLAR and PENNY HARRINGTON
'Years of research . . . show that female police officers
are less authoritarian and use excessive force less often
than their male counterparts.'
|
0ver the past several weeks, the citizens of Los Angeles
have learned that their police department is home to what has been
de scribed in press accounts as a "fraternity." The "macho-bonding
rituals" include drunken parties in the presence of command staff
at the Police Academy, celebrating shootings and killings by officers
and sharing an apartment for sexual liaisons while on duty. There
are even tattoos and patches to signify membership in the brotherhood.
Police Chief Bernard C. Parks blames the department's troubles
in part on hiring too fast during the recent department expansion.
It is not that the men in blue were hired too fast. It's that the
wrong kind of men were hired. And not enough women.
For too long the LAPD has sought out men trained in violence by
recruiting at military bases and using screening procedures
that overemphasize upper-body strength--a trait that has
proved to bear less relationship to performance as a police officer
than do verbal and mediation skills. The impact of these recruiting
practices has been to systematically screen out qualified women
and screen in violence-prone men. Therein lies the root of the
LAPD's current scandal.
Years of research both in the U.S. and internationally show that
female police officers are less authoritarian and use excessive
force less often than their male counterparts. Female officers
are better at defusing potentially violent confrontations with citizens
and possess better communication skills.
Officer Perez said women couldn't be trusted to be 'in the
loop.' Good for them.
|
Perhaps the difference is best explained in men's and women's attitudes
toward policing. According to one noted researcher, Joseph Balkin,
"Policemen see police work as involving control through authority,
while policewomen see it as a public service." He concluded,
"In some respects at least, women are better suited for police work
than men."
The comparative lack of women in the LAPD--fewer than one-fifth
of the force is female--reinforces and exaggerates a workplace
culture that condones authoritarian personalities that thrive on
violence, where men with common backgrounds and values participate
in unacceptable behavior with no fear of scrutiny by their like-minded
peers.
It's not likely that many women officers will be implicated in
the everwidening Rampart scandal. Ex-officer Rafael Perez, who has
blown the top off the Rampart scandal, said it best when he told
investigators that female officers could not be trusted to be "in
the loop," referring to one of the women officers as a "weaker link"
because she was female. Perez's comments are reminiscent of Mark
Fuhrman and his "Men Against Woffien," a secret society within the
LAPD that schemed to harass women and drive them off the force.
Introducing significantly greater numbers of women to the force
would break down this locker room mentality.
In 1991, the Christopher Commission issued its stinging indictment
of the LAPD and found that the underrepresentation of women
contributed to the department's excessive force problems. Since
then, the City Council twice has mandated that the LAPD dramatically
increase its hiring of women officers with the goal of gender balance
as soon as possible. Yet in its expansion by more than 2,000 officers
in the past few years, the department has squandered its greatest
opportunity to hire enough women.
Long ago we ended the debate about whether women make good cops.
Perhaps now we should ask whether we should allow men to be cops.
Their proclivity toward violence and the attitudes exhibited by
many men within the LAPD have ruined lives and threaten the ability
of police to effectively serve the community and may end up costing
the citizens of Los Angeles many mfllions of tax dollars.
Any investigation into LAPD corruption will miss the mark if it
fails to examine how the exclusion of women officers and the promotion
of macho, militaristic tough guys contributed to this massive policing
scandal. Maybe boys will be boys, but should we allow them to be
cops?
Katherine Spillar is the national coordinator of the Feminist
Majority Foundation. Penny Harrington, a former police chief in
Portland, Ore., heads the foundation's National Center for Women
and Policing.
|